Litigation
-
Federal Court Imposes Permanent Injunction Against Measure 119
A federal court today held that Oregon’s Measure 119 is preempted by federal law and violates the First Amendment of…
-
Court v. Arbitration: Why You May Want to Rethink Putting a Mandatory Arbitration Clause in Your Contracts
Author: Blake Marvis, Emerge Litigation Attorney Rarely do litigators these days come across a contract that does not contain an…
-
Residency Requirements Under Attack – Analysis of the First Circuit’s Opinion on the Dormant Commerce Clause’s Effect on Cannabis Residency Requirements
Author: Blake Marvis, Attorney at Emerge Law Group; Oregon Litigation Practice Group In August, the First Circuit Court of Appeals…
-
Court Hears Argument in Landmark Case Seeking to Open Access to Psilocybin Therapy
Nation’s First Legal Challenge to Allow Psilocybin Therapy in End-of-Life Care Under “Right-To-Try” Law Heard by the Ninth Circuit Court…
-
California’s Aid in Dying Law Challenged in Federal Court for Discriminating Against Terminally Ill Patients with Physical Disabilities
Read Mercury News Article here: When the Aid-In-Dying Law Leaves You Out A number of Californians with terminal illnesses involving…
-
Emerge Law Group Challenges Sonoma County, California Policy of Fining Medical Cannabis Users as Illicit Commercial Growers
Sonoma County, CA, August 16, 2021 — Emerge Law Group has filed a Petition in California Superior Court challenging penalties…
-
Signing on the Dotted Line: Contract Signature Issues in Litigation
The idea that “any contract is better than no contract” gets many new businesses into hot water. Small businesses, start-ups,…